everyone's high taxes. (Committee Chairman Berman arrived remotely at 9:03 a.m.)
She explained that property taxes have increased, but not only by the County Board.
Tax increases come from all taxing bodies, such as schools, towns, park districts, fire
districts, et cetera. Theobald stated that Kane County Government receives less than
four percent of residents' property tax bill. She added that of the four percent, over 70%
is already spoken for as mandated by the State. She stated that to suggest that the
County Board is the reason residents' tax bill is increasing, is not honest. She noted
that the flyer insinuates just that. She explained that if a resident's tax bill is $10K, less
than $400 is given to the County. Additionally, she added that residents' property tax
bills have increased due to their property values rising, even when the tax rate stays
flat. Theobald stated that the flyer claims the County Board has poor oversight and out
of control spending. However, the four percent that is given to the County provides
public safety, State's Attorneys, Courts, health department, child services, restaurant
inspections, senior programs, election security, Veteran's Services, road and bridge
repair, farmland protection, fair wages for staff and elected officials, et cetera. She
hopes everyone could agree that this is a lot for their tax bill. She explained that the
County's tax rate held steady for 12 years, but costs due to inflation and tariffs and
allocation from the federal government have been frozen, which shifts the burden onto
the counties. Meanwhile, other taxing bodies have continually made small Consumer
Price Index (CPI) adjustments to keep up with inflation. Kane County has not made a
CPI adjustment in 14 years. The current tax increase is a small increment.
Kane County resident, Jenine Mehr, spoke on the Kane County Budget shortfall. She
stated that there have been discussions for the County to utilize $4M out of the Capital
Spending Fund. She explained that this is not extra money for the County to use at will,
but dedicated for long-term capital needs, such as roads, bridges, building repair,
equipment replacement, and technology upgrades. These funds are the backbone
investments that keep County government functioning and protect tax payers from
costly breakdowns. Mehr explained that this fund was created to provide stability and
ensure that critical infrastructure would not be neglected. She stated that under
Lauzen's prior leadership, a citizen falsely complained that the County would not
maintain projects supported by the fund. Ironically, the County is now talking on raising
that very fund due to fiscal mismanagement of the County's General Fund. Mehr stated
that this is the very thing the Capital Spending Fund was designed to prevent; the
temptation to raid it in times of fiscal crisis. Once the County sets the precedent, it will
continue until the County will not have the reserves needed to keep up with buildings,
roads, and systems. Mehr stated that this short-term fix could create a long-term
liability. She explained that the responsible course is not to weaken a fund that protects
tax payers, but to restore fiscal discipline where spending has occurred, such as
offering early retirement, imposing a hiring freeze, and eliminating frivolous consultant
contracts. She stated that tax payers created the Capital Spending Fund so that future
generations would not pay the price for today's neglect and using it now as a bandaid
for the General Fund, is short-sighted, irresponsible, and unfair to the citizens of Kane
County.