a snapshot of ITD, BLD, and GIS's submitted budget. He noted that they are still
working on additional items for the Special Funds, such as the Mill Creek Special
Service Area (MCSSA) and the Capital Fund. He explained that he will be working with
the Finance Department to figure out the 2025 year-end balance capital projects, in
order to budget for FY2026. Fahnestock explained that the County's Financial Policiy
require the County to budget for projects for FY2026, or submit an Emergency
Purchase Affidavit (EPA) to make an amendment to the budget. He stated that he is
trying to work on the correct projections for Capital to try to avoid an EPA. Fahnestock
explained that today's presentation will review the operating FY2026 Budget for ITD,
BLD, and GIS. He reviewed ITD/BLD's mission statement. He listed the 2025
Committee Goals. He reviewed BLD/ITD Goals and Objectives. The majority of these
are to maintain and support the existing infrastructure, buildings, and offices.
Fahnestock stated it is important to understand that BLD and ITD are supporting
departments. They support all other County departments and offices. There is a
centralized function for ITD where they support the courts, public safety, State's
Attorney's Office, Treasurer's Office, et. cetera. Fahnestock explained that the majority
of County offices utilize ITD and BLD. He stated that many of the operational costs
presented are outbound expenses that support other departments/offices, such as tech
support staff, maintenance technicians, and software and support for all applications
and databases. He asked the Committee to keep in mind that when reviewing ITD's
and BLD's FY2026 Budget and making cuts it will not only affect ITD/BLD, but the other
County departments/offices. Fahnestock explained that the ITD/BLD budget is looked
at in three ways: support and maintain the County's assets, use existing infrastructure
more effectively, and looking into new ideas and considerations. He noted that very
rarely does the budget stretch to the new ideas. Fahnestock shared the ITD/BLD
organizational chart. He stated that changes will be made between the departments
that fall into the Special Revenue Fund and General Fund. He explained that if there
are salaries, benefits,and costs attributed to a Special Revenue Fund, the General
Fund expense would then move to the Special Revenue, such as MCSSA. Regarding
GIS, Fahnestock stated that he is working with staff to identify prorated salaries that
could potentially be covered by the GIS Fund. He noted that this change will make a
difference in the department's bottom line. He explained that he has been working
collaboratively with the Finance Department and Human Resource Management
(HRM) Department to figure out the best budget for the County departments that are
funded by the General Fund to present to the County Board. He presented the ITD
FY2026 Budget. He explained the contents of the report that make up the budget. He
spoke on the reduction of staffing levels and shifting payroll into a special fund that
would reduce the overall benefit costs. He noted that the overall costs for salaries and
wages and overtime have decreased. He explained that the Contractual Services
expenses have had larger cuts made. In FY2025, Contractual Services expenses were
$1,064,904.00. For FY2026, the submitted budget is $808,704.00. Fahnestock spoke
on the countywide expenses. He stated that the countywide expenses cover a lot of the
software contracts and the Judicial Public Safety case management system. He noted
that this expense will increase 5% for FY2026, which could be an increase of
$100,000. (Madam Chairman Pierog arrived in-person at 10:46 a.m.). Fahnestock
stated that the overall commodities expense was decreased by 13%. Overall, the ITD's
FY2026 Budget is down 9%. He explained that the net difference from $5.24M in
FY2025 to $4.76M in FY2026, is approximately a $500K decrease. He stated that he
will continue to work with the Finance Department to find other ways to decrease the