Special Human Services Committee meeting, she explained that several
department heads voiced their difficulties of reorganizing their departments
without a long process. Regarding reclassifications, she explained that only if
there is an aggregate increase in total grades would that require County Board
approval, due to this being an increase to the department salary total. Beyond
this, department heads can send the reclassification request to the Human
Resources Department for the new positions to be re-graded. This would require
the department heads to write a new set of job descriptions. Lobrillo stated that
as long as the aggregate does not increase, Board approval is not needed.
However, if the County Board would like to review each reorganization, that
would be within their purview. Lobrillo asked for the Committee's direction on
how to move forward. Chairman Surges reviewed the discussions had with
department heads at the last Special Human Services Committee meeting.
ITD/BLD Exec. Dir. Fahnestock stated that there was never a defined process
for how change within a department is managed subsequent to the policy being
passed. He has suggested in the past that a list be brought forth to the County
Board each month with the reorganizational changes within departments.
Currently, he would like to offer a person a position that will absorb additional
responsibilities, but the compensation is too low. If he raises the compensation
amount, the salary would be more than the 75th percentile that is listed. This will
cause the department to go through the re-grading process, which will take more
time. The applicant will not be able to wait on the County's approval before a job
offer can be presented. Fahnestock stated the process needs to be better
defined and easier to follow to be able to execute these changes in a timely
manner. Without the defined process, the departments are waiting months
before they can hire for a position. Fahnestock voiced his misunderstanding on
the steps within the reclassification process. Lobrillo stated that she first heard of
the difficulties at the Special Human Services Committee meeting. She
questioned if the Committee would like her to clarify the process and/or clarify
the process within the Compensation Policy. Much discussion ensued. The
Committee provided consensus to direct Lobrillo to draft an amendment to the
Kane County Code regarding the reclassification process.
C.
Amending Kane County Financial Policies Related to Travel
Chairman Surges referenced the proposed County Policy 2-72: Travel Expense
Generally, Section C: Arbitration, Item 1: Any dispute between the traveler and the
auditor will be submitted to and resolved by the County Board Chairman. It is his
understanding that this Committee would like to strike the word Chairman and change
it to County Board.
HRM Exec. Dir. Lobrillo provided clarification. She stated that no amendment to this
part of the policy needs to be changed. The changes that the Committee is to look into
involve the approval process. She explained that it was requested that an approval
process for Board Members be implemented in policy. She noted that this is a policy
and cannot change the ordinance. She summarized that this resolution is a policy to
implement a travel expense approval process for County Board Members. The
mentioned amendment would need to be done to the actual ordinance, and not today's
resolution. Lobrillo explained that making the amendment would need an ordinance.