can cut expenses. However, she wanted to present this information to express
the concerns of the SAO. Mosser reviewed the significant increased statistics in
investigations and cases within each SAO unit, such as the Criminal Division,
Felony Screening, Major Crimes Unit, Gun and Gang, Narcotics, Child Advocacy
Center, Special Victims, Domestic Violence, Victim Services, DUI and Major
Traffic, Juvenile Delinquency, Abuse and Neglect, Misdemeanor and Traffic,
Conviction Integrity and Resentencing, Post Conviction, Specialty Courts, Child
Support, Deferred Prosecution, Collaborative Diversion, and Civil Division. She
spoke of the financial impact each one of these cases have on the SAO. Mosser
stated that she has visited Springfield, Illinois numerous times to request grants
to help serve the community. Recently, the SAO was granted $1M for assistance
on Domestic Violence cases. Mosser spoke on her frustrations of being asked to
cut 4.8% from the SAO budget. She echoed Judiciary and Courts that they are
federally mandated. She spoke on her office's proactive approach to solving
issues around the County. She continues to seek out grants and be fiscally
responsible. She and CFO Hunt will work together to try to find areas in which
the SAO could make cuts. However, Mosser stated she will not lay-off any
employee from her office. Each one of these employees is crucial to the
functionality of the SAO. She explained that the SAO is willing to work with the
County Board, but she cannot lessen her office that is finally running efficiently.
Mosser addressed questions and comments from the Committee. Much
discussion ensued.
15.
Public Defender (R. Conant)
Monthly Report
A.
Public Defender Conant stated the monthly report was on file. She commented
on the requested budget cuts directed by the Finance Department and the
County Board. As reported last month, the Public Defender's Office (PDO) will
be fully staffed, due to the recognition of the County Board on the importance
and need of comparable, equitable salaries for these attorneys. In the PDO,
moral is up because these attorneys can afford to stay in the job they love and
can focus on plans that the PDO have had. Conant stated that experienced
attorneys are a premium. Many hours are spent in training these attorneys,
which makes it very important to retain them. This makes a difference because
the PDO is mandated through the U.S. Constitution and legislation to provide
the right to counsel. Conant spoke on the amount of time it takes to
appropriately address each Pretrial Fairness Act hearing. She noted that most of
these hearings are not planned and are in addition to the attorney's case call.
Conant stated that because of the Pretrial Fairness Act, the PDO needs to retain
trained and educated attorneys, in order to effectively represent their clients.
Conant spoke on the increased impact of the Pretrial Fairness Act. Conant
explained that with the additional funds granted by the County Board, the PDO
was able to hire the proper amount of attorneys and support staff. Conant spoke
on the impacts her office has had on each case and the ability to represent their
clients in court. She explained that attorneys are the majority of the PDO's
budget. If these proposed budget cuts were to be implemented, she would need
to cut these attorneys. Conant explained that these attorneys carry out the
mandates and without them they cannot ensure effective and efficient
resolutions of cases. She echoed that if any of the Judiciary partners make staff