Government Center  
719 S. Batavia Ave., Bldg. A  
Geneva, IL 60134  
Kane County  
KC AD HOC Liquor Commission  
Meeting Minutes  
PIEROG, Berman, Kious, Linder, Surges  
Thursday, August 14, 2025  
11:30 AM  
County Boardroom  
1.  
2.  
Call To Order  
Chairman Pierog called the meeting to order at 12:15 PM.  
Roll Call  
Chairman Corinne M. Pierog  
Board Member Chris Kious  
Board Member Michael Linder  
Board Member Clifford Surges  
PRESENT  
Board Member Dale Berman  
REMOTE  
Also present: Co. Bd. Members Allan*, Molina*, Williams; SA Mosser & staff Frank,  
Brady, O'Brien; COB Exec. Asst. Tallitsch; ITD staff Peters; and members of the press  
and public.  
3.  
4.  
Remote Attendance Requests  
Chairman Pierog announced the remote attendance requests for today's meeting. She  
asked the Committee if there were any objections to Committee Member Berman  
attending today's meeting remotely. There were no objections.  
Approval Minutes: June 25, 2025  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT  
Chris Kious  
Committee Member Surges asked SAO Chief of Civil Frank if the June 25, 2025  
meeting was closed, or was it extended to today's meeting? Frank stated that the June  
25, 2025 meeting was closed. However, he explained that the Liquor Commission is  
different due to it being an ongoing meeting throughout the year until all the liquor  
licenses are approved. Surges stated that he needs to understand the reconsideration  
of the Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club liquor license. He has understood that a  
reconsideration can only occur in the meeting that it was presented and only by a  
member of the prevailing group. He stated that if this isn't a continuation of the last  
meeting, then this liquor license should be put forth as a new application. Frank  
explained that within the language of a reconsideration it states, "meeting or session".  
The session is the specifics as it relates to the Liquor Commission, because they are in  
a year long session, with the final vote for all liquor licenses being taken at the end of  
the year. As for the second part of the reconsideration, Frank wished not to speak on  
due to it being unclear if the Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club's application is being brought  
forth by a Commission member, or not. He explained that the Chairman of the County  
Board does have the authority to bring this to the attention of the Commission if no  
motion for reconsideration is made under the terms that are outlined. Surges clarified  
that Chairman Pierog can ask the question for reconsideration, but if other members do  
not oblige to the request, the motion would not be presented on the floor. He also  
asked if Chairman Pierog recused herself from the first vote on the Blackjacks  
Gentlemen's Club liquor license, does she need to do the same for this vote? Frank  
explained that the purpose for Pierog's recusal during the first vote was due to  
accepted political donations. He stated that there is case law that states political  
donations does not create an actual conflict. He explained that Pierog's recusal for the  
last vote, does not constitute her from recusing herself for today's vote. Discussion  
ensued.  
Committee Member Berman motioned to adjourn, Surges seconded. Motion failed by a  
2-3 vote.  
5.  
Public Comment  
Brian Anderson, Sugar Grove, stated that he attended the last liquor commission  
meeting. He encouraged Chairman Pierog to recuse herself from the final vote due to  
the political donations received. He requested that the Committee look at the public  
safety entity of voting for this liquor license for Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club. He  
explained that Kane County counts itself as family-friendly and safe. He stated that  
there is one strip club in Kane County, Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club, that has operated  
for several years without a liquor license. He explained that when a liquor license is  
granted, it will heighten public safety concerns within a 15 to 20 mile radius. Anderson  
spoke on the data collected by the Kane County Sheriff's Office (KCSO) that shows  
alcohol serving venues with similar geographic content result in a measurable increase  
in disorderly conduct, driving under the influence (DUI), and late night disturbances. He  
stated that the County has been wrestling with the funding of public safety. He stated  
that this is not about Chairman Pierog's collecting more political donations from  
Blackjacks if this liquor license is approved, or the extra $26K to the bottom line for the  
budget. This is for about the County as a whole. He explained that the County cannot  
count itself as a family-friendly and safe community, then pass a liquor license that will  
heighten it. He urged the Commission not to grant this liquor license.  
Kane County resident, Kathy Showalter, shared her concern with the answer of "no"  
not being listened to. She questioned how many times one establishment can apply for  
a liquor license. She explained that this Commission voted against Blackjacks  
Gentlemen's Club's liquor license. As voiced before, Showalter stated, "shame on  
Madam Chairman for accepting money from this establishment for her campaign." She  
noted that she does not want her grandkids to think this is what Kane County is about.  
She explained that this particular family that runs this establishment has been in this  
predicament for several years. Now that Madam Chairman has accepted money from  
Blackjacks for her campaign, the public has found this to be fishy. She questioned if  
Madam Chairman would be accepting more money from Blackjacks. She mentioned  
that a rumor has been circulating that Blackjacks could sue the County. She  
questioned if Blackjacks sues Kane County, will this open the door for other  
establishments to sue the County. She inquired if the Commission has lost their  
principal on this matter.  
Kane County resident, Jenine Mehr, stated that this Commission has already voted  
against this liquor license application in June 2025 with a two to two tie, which meant  
the application was denied. However, the application is back, not because any new  
facts have been discovered, but because the applicant is pushing to discredit a moral  
obligation made by Commissioner Berman, suggesting that moral reasoning is out of  
bounds is wrong legally, procedurally, and ethically. Mehr stated that this is bullying to  
reverse a decision that was already made. She explained that under Illinois' Liquor  
Control Act 235: Liquor License is purely personal privilege and shall not constitute  
property. The law allows licensing authority to weigh public morals, community welfare,  
and the character of the applicant, when deciding whether to issue or deny a license.  
Additionally, Roberts' Rules of Order permits moral reasoning and debate. Mehr noted  
that Commissioner Berman was within his rights to speak about this. She stated that it  
is troubling that the Kane County Liquor Commissioner, Madam Chairman Pierog, has  
accepted thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Blackjacks. This raises  
legitimate concerns about impartiality and trust. Mehr explained that the owner of  
Blackjacks, Anne Marie Buttitta, is operating through Elgin Entertainment Holdings.  
However, in 2012, the club was owned by Dominic Buttitta and Anthony Buttitta, who  
were federally convicted of running an illegal internet gambling operation and tax  
evasion. Due to this, they served prison time and lost their liquor license. Mehr  
explained that the public has been told that the current owner is completely different  
than the last, but unlikely. She stated that approving this application would set a  
dangerous precedence; that a handful of votes under pressure can override a prior  
decision, ignore criminal history, and look past ethical red flags. She urged the  
Commission to vote no on this liquor license application and to make it final.  
Kane County resident, Denise Theobald, stated that it was made clear from the  
previous meeting that the public and the County Board oppose the approval of a liquor  
license for Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club. She explained that this opposition comes  
from personal and moral objections, not from legal or procedural reasoning. She stated  
that the law is clear that a license cannot be denied based on personal beliefs. She  
noted that doing so would be prejudicial and in violation of free speech and expression.  
She explained that granting this liquor license to Blackjacks would make this  
establishment safer, due to the age limit being increased from 18 to 21 for patrons and  
would make the establishment safer. With the liquor license, patrons would need to be  
21, instead of 18, to visit the establishment. Additionally, the liquor licenses' rules  
require stricter oversight, including more clothing requirements for the performers,  
inspections, and security measures that do not currently apply. Theobald stated the  
new owner of Blackjacks has been fully vetted, which shows no criminal record and/or  
arrests, passed all background checks, and checked off all the boxes for the  
requirements. Additionally, Blackjacks has strong security. Theobald stated that the  
location of the establishment is remote and would bring more jobs to the County,  
increasing revenue. She noted that police calls have been rare. She stated that the  
claims of a murder happening at the establishment are false. She explained that exotic  
dancing and burlesque nude performances have been a part of world cultures for  
centuries. She spoke on her father's experience as a magician, who would often times  
work alongside nude performers. She stated that these are all legal forms of  
entertainment. Finally, Theobald stated that the latest accusation against Madam  
Chairman Pierog for accepting campaign donations from a local business is legal. She  
explained that the public demanded she recuse herself from the first vote, due to the  
donation. However, now her political opponents would like her to vote on this matter, so  
it can be put on record. Theobald stated that denying a liquor license due to family ties  
or hypothetical reasons are not a basis for refusal.  
Michelle Bettag, St. Charles, stated that her issue is not with the establishment, but  
with Madam Chairman Pierog's paid to play. She has watched how donors have  
benefited from Pierog's donations. She explained that the unions have taken all of the  
County work from local and small businesses in Kane County. All while, Pierog's  
donations have flooded her account from outside of Kane County. Bettag stated that  
Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club has donated money towards Pierog's campaign. She  
asked Pierog not to vote for this liquor license. Additionally, she stated that  
Commissioners Kious and Linder should not vote due to them receiving donations, as  
well. She explained that problems do arise when dealing with certain establishments,  
such as safety concerns when liquor is served. She stated that the previous vote on  
this liquor license application was clear. However, Pierog was banking on the possibility  
of Commissioner Berman not knowing about today's meeting, or not well enough to  
participate. Bettag thanked Berman for being present and willing to vote. She stated  
that this is about Pierog who shakes down Kane County employees to vote yes for the  
sales tax. She mentioned that Pierog uses the unions to perform the shake down. This  
is pay to play.  
Simon Andrew, Elgin, reflected on the disjunction between a neighborhood kid and the  
establishment known as a gentlemen's club. He noted that he grew up in Elgin close to  
the establishment. He explained that his mother took him to see several events in east  
St. Charles. As they drove down Route 25, they would often times pass the  
gentlemen's club where flashing neon lights would state "Hot Girls, Full Nude". He  
would ask his mother the meaning of this, but she would never provide a straight  
answer. This occurred 15 years ago. Now, Andrew does not have any desire for his  
own wife to be asked this same question from their children. He explained that new  
houses are being built on both sides of Route 25 that are encroaching on Blackjacks  
area. He thinks it is time for the establishment to go in general. He stated that the  
questions today are not an academic debate on whether the County has the legal right  
to ban such an institution. It is for the Commission to decide whether this institution  
should be in our County next to homes. Andrew stated that if the Commission votes to  
approve this liquor license, they are voting to support a sign that says, "Hot Girls, Full  
Nude" flashing in front of a school bus, encouraging young males to objectify their  
female companions, and encouraging young women to train themselves to become  
seductresses who savage for sugar daddies. He urged the Commission to vote no.  
Steve Serafin, Elgin, stated that the most local strip club to Kane County, Heavenly  
Bodies, was closed down last year. Therefore, these patrons from Cook County will be  
traveling to Kane County for Blackjacks. Serafin stated that there has not been an  
impact study completed on this location, such as the capacity, parking, and traffic. He  
noted that this establishment is located on a two-lane highway with no turning lanes.  
He stated that this will impact the Kane County Sheriff's Office (KCSO), who are  
understaffed, and the County's overall budget. He explained that there will be other  
impacts to the County due to the closure of Heavenly Bodies in non-violent crimes,  
such as drug use, drug dealing, and solicitation. Serafin stated that he has a print-out  
that he would like to distribute to all County Board members. He explained that five  
days ago in a chat from R/Stripclubs was Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club for solicitation.  
He stated that the fact remains that on the internet there are chat clubs that have  
stated solicitation for $50.00 to $400.00 going on under Marie Anne Buttitta tutelage.  
Steve Leffler, St. Charles, stated the Kane County's system of liquor control and how  
society is constructed is not good. He spoke on his experiences when visiting Europe.  
He explained that Europe is a lot less strict than the United States. He stated that it  
was an enjoyable experience to be along the river with friends and alcohol and not  
have to worry about things. He explained that liquor causes a lot of issues in our  
society. While other societies do not have the same issues or the uptight view points on  
liquor.  
Committee Member Berman stated that the issue is not about donations for campaigns  
or pay to play schemes. In his 30 years of serving in government, he has never been  
questioned about the gifts and donations for a campaign. He explained that campaigns  
receive funding from many different organizations and sources, that have many  
different ideas and reasons on why they donate. He stated that he has spent a lot of  
time thinking about this issue. In this case, Berman thinks that the Commission form is  
as good as any other government entity. He stated that the Commission needs to  
accept the decision that was made. He explained that the public is missing the point of  
the Liquor Commission. He stated that it is not about campaign money.  
Chairman Pierog stated that this is a complex issue. She mentioned that she has  
looked at an article published on Kane County Speaks regarding this issue. She found  
the article to be disturbing, due to it's threatening nature. The article stated that this  
business was going to physically threaten one of the Kane County Board members and  
to make an offer that they cannot refuse. These very people threatening lives are those  
that live within the community. Due to this, Pierog took a look at what the law dictates.  
She stated that this is a complex issue between community standards, public safety,  
and First Amendment Rights. However, this time it is specifically focused on Kane  
County's Adult Entertainment Ordinance and it's regulation of nudity. These types of  
ordinances regulate adult entertainment venues, including establishments that feature  
nude dancing. These laws are designed to protect public morals, prevent neighborhood  
disturbances, ensure community safety. Pierog stated that these ordinances often  
include zoning restrictions, licensing requirements, and rules governing performer  
conduct. At the same time, the First Amendment of the United States' Constitution  
guarantees the freedom of speech and expression. Pierog stated that this protection  
extends to expressive conduct, such as dancing. However, this is not absolute. Pierog  
explained that courts have consistently upheld regulations that serve substantial  
government interests, such as preventing crime, maintaining public order, and  
safeguarding community morality. She stated that Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club  
request for a liquor license involves navigating Kane County's licensing process,  
ensuring compliance with zoning laws and following state regulations under Illinois law.  
After the review of Blackjacks' liquor license application, there was no issue found.  
Pierog stated that in Kane County the ordinance is aimed to strike this delicate  
balance, ensuring that adult entertainment does not undermine community standards,  
while respecting performers' First Amendment Rights. She explained that licensing and  
zoning restrictions are examples of lawful regulations, that are properly enforced, and  
uphold the constitutional balance. While the First Amendment offers broad protections,  
local ordinances demonstrate that sensible regulations can coexist with constitutional  
rights that protect individual freedoms and community values. Pierog explained that  
when this liquor license was presented, it was stated that Blackjacks followed every  
regulation that was included in the application. There were no citing of law enforcement  
issues, violations, or sexual impropriety. As the Kane County Liquor Commissioner,  
Pierog has had the opportunity to weigh on whether or not institutions should have their  
liquor licenses resubmitted and allowed. Pierog spoke on the previous denied liquor  
license applications from 2024. She stated that the moral aspect of all of this is keen  
for her, due to her being a resident of Kane County for over 25 years. However,  
morality and dance are two separate things to her. She explained that this industry  
allows people to make a living and can offer a 401(K) and health insurance benefits.  
With the acceptance of this application, she stated that what can be enforced is the full  
nudity aspect will no longer be allowed. She noted that currently and as it continues,  
full nudity is allowed.  
The Committee moved to Executive Session.  
6.  
7.  
New Business  
None.  
Old Business  
None.  
A.  
Reconsideration of Application by Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club  
After an Executive Session, the vote on Blackjacks Gentlemen's Club liquor license  
application failed due to a lack of motion.  
8.  
Executive Session (if needed)  
The Liquor Commission entered into Executive Session at 12:15 p.m. to discuss  
pending, probable, and imminent litigation on a motion made by Kious, Linder  
seconded. Motion carried unanimously by roll call vote.  
The Commission returned to Open Session at 1:40 p.m. on a motion made by Kious,  
Linder seconded. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote.  
RESULT:  
APPROVED BY ROLL CALL VOTE  
Chris Kious  
MOVER:  
Michael Linder  
SECONDER:  
Corinne M. Pierog, Chris Kious, Michael Linder, and Clifford  
Surges  
AYE:  
Dale Berman  
AWAY:  
9.  
Adjournment  
RESULT:  
APPROVED BY VOICE VOTE  
Michael Linder  
Dale Berman  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
This meeting was adjourned at 1:41 PM.  
Savannah Zgobica  
Sr. Recording Secretary