amend this petition to include the added stipulations, Kenyon seconded. Motion
to Amend passed by a 5-3 vote. (Committee Member Iqbal left at 10:34 a.m.)
Petitioner and property owner, Richard Johnson, shared his support of Horizon
Solar's project. His family believes that the community solar farm proposed by
Horizon Solar is an appropriate and worthy use of their land. He noted that the
Committee will hear objections on this petition. However, he is prepared to
respond to each of them. Johnson specifically spoke on the claims of easement
against his property, since they may feature prominently in the objections. He
read aloud the last paragraph of his attorney's letter that has been submitted as
part of the petition.
Horizon Solar Power Lead Developer, Andy Melka, commented on the added
stipulations to the project. He stated that this petition was always meant to be
compliant with all applicable County, State, and Federal laws. Regarding
decommissioning, Melka explained that a plan was submitted to the ZBA, which
included provisions for the removal and disposal of the solar project at the end
of useful life. Along with, financial security to do this.
Carrie Svihlik, 1N700 Meredith Road, Maple Park, provided a presentation on
her objection to this petition. She explained that her residence borders the
proposed solar farm. She stated that the easement the solar company is saying
is not there, surely is. This easement has been used for agricultural purposes
over the last 20 years. Svihlik stated she is pursuing legal action on this matter.
This easement is her only access to her farmland. Legal action must be taken
because after 30 years, the land owner is now denying her access. Svihlik
reviewed her presentation. She listed her oppositions pertaining to this proposed
solar farm. Illinois Public Act 102-1123, details the minimum requirements by the
state for commercial, wind, and solar facilities. Within this petition's site plan, it
shows proposed 60-foot gravel access road, utility poles, and a pole-mounted
utility load break switch. The 60-foot access road is located between two
non-participating properties. The minimum setback for any facility of solar
installation is 50-feet from a non-participating property. This causes an issue
with the new roadway and the additional components. Svihlik provided additional
issues with this petition regarding State and County policies. She shared the
land evaluation and site assessment. She reviewed the County's Land Use
Opinion Summary. Svihlik stated that this site is not suitable for this project.
Ruddy & Petersen Law Group Attorney, Stuart Peterson, spoke on the
requirements within the state statue that restricts what the County can do
regarding solar facilities. According to the land use requirements, this property is
not suitable for a solar field, because they cannot physically meet the 50-foot
required setback. Petersen stated that a speaker from the Kaneville Fire
Department will be addressing their concerns from a safety aspect. He noted
that the fire department received notice of this petition, but was not required to
share their input. Petersen asked the Committee what the requirements are of
the intergovernmental agencies that are interested in this project. This project is
requiring a suspected one-way in and out access road off of Route 38. This
could cause hazardous conditions for emergency responders. Petersen spoke