the neighbors' daily lives. Additionally, a STR reduces the property values and erodes
the character of the community. Davisson explained that if the County Board signs this
ordinance it would codify all of these issues. She requested that this ordinance be
tabled. She explained that there is nothing within the ordinance that would limit future
STRs from opening. There is nothing in the ordinance that takes into consideration the
unique features of particular homes that wish to run a STR in a neighborhood.
Davisson stated that this ordinance is a one size fits all blanket permission slip for
transient lodging businesses to operate in residential communities. She explained that
there is nothing in the ordinance that would speak to verification, enforcement, or
reporting measures for violations. She stated that the main reason this ordinance
should not be forwarded is because the County Board enjoys considerable legal
advantage, in the fact that dealing with the STR issue in an ambiguous way. However,
the minute the County Board passes this ordinance and declares that STRs should
exist within residential communities, all legal leverage is lost and it will take away any
hope from the community to restore residential neighborhoods for their intended use.
Davisson believes that a remedy exists in the current zoning code. She requests that
this Committee table the ordinance and to not forward it onto the County Board.
7.
Monthly Financials (K. Hopkinson)
Monthly Finance Reports
A.
Fin. Exec. Dir. Hopkinson stated the monthly financial reports were on file. She
reviewed the County's General Fund - General Account variances. She stated
that as the County closes out FY2025, all payroll and employee benefits have
been submitted and posted. The final items to close out FY2025 are the Sales
Tax, the Regional Transit Authority (RTA) Sales Tax revenue, the interest
revenue, and the contractual services and commodities. Hopkinson noted that
the County has until Friday, January 16, 2026 to have all FY2025 expenses
posted. She stated that the FY2025 Budget was set to expend $27M in
reserves. However, the County will use approximately $20M. Hopkinson stated
that the difference in the use of reserves is due to the County collecting three
percent more in revenue through the Charges for Services, such as fees
collected through the recording of deeds in the County Clerk's Office.
Additionally, the sales tax revenue and the reimbursement revenue were higher
than expected. Hopkinson stated that expenses are less due to a reduction in
salaries and wages. The County budgeted $87M, but will expend $84M.
Hopkinson reviewed the Tax Revenues Key Indicators across all County funds.
She stated that the Sales Tax and the RTA Sales Tax revenue continues to be
higher than expected. She noted that the Personal Property Replacement Tax
revenue (PPRT) and the Local Use Tax revenue continues to decline. She
shared a graph that depicted the other taxes the County collects throughout the
year. (Committee Member Allan arrived in-person at 9:19 a.m.) She spoke on
the County's 90-day reserve. She explained that at the end of the fiscal year on
November 30, 2025, the County will have $60M in reserves throughout all of the
General Fund accounts. She stated that the County's General Fund - General
Account will be below the 90-day reserve amount. However, with the other
Special Reserve funds, the County will have over the 90-day reserve amount.
With the current FY2026 Budget, it is forecasted the County will utilize $6.3M in
reserves. (Committee Member Bates arrived in-person at 9:20 a.m.) Hopkinson
addressed questions and comments from the Committee. Discussion ensued.