Member Surges arrived remotely at 9:03 a.m.). This reminded him of the Kane County
Treasurer's Supplemental Contextual Economic Data that is included in the monthly
report. Leffler stated that some of the data makes sense, but some does not. He
provided examples that were shared in today's committee agenda packet. He stated
that Lauzen is the County's Treasurer. He shared his gratitude for the interest
payments. However, Lauzen has narrowed his focus into wire points. Therefore, he is
worried that Lauzen is leaving money on the table, due to him being distracted by other
matters.
Kane County Workforce Development Director, Adam Schauer, introduced himself. He
stated that he has been the new director of Workforce Development for approximately
two weeks.
Due to the loss of her voice, Kane County resident, Denise Theobald, asked a
constituent from the audience to read her comments. Her comments were as followed.
The Kane County constituent spoke on the hundred pages of political opinion articles
from right-winged advocacy groups included in the monthly Treasurer Report. He
stated that Treasurer Lauzen calls this the Supplemental Contextual Data that is
included within his monthly report. However, these are not financial reports. These
were partisan commentaries attacking political opponents, such as Kamala Harris and
Governor Pritzker. In today's report, there are 61 pages of sharpie, right-winged opinion
articles. None of which have anything to do with the County or it's finances. He stated
that if the Treasurer wanted to conceptualize the financial picture, then he needs to
present real economic data, in regards to inflation, housing, healthcare, food costs, and
how the lack of federal funding put financial strain on revenue streams. On behalf of
Theobald, he inquired about the lack of information on the rate of return. He explained
that any professionally managed investment report includes standard performance
indicators. However, month after month, the County Board does not receive this
essential information. Also not recorded, is clarity on how much of the interest income
received is coming from temporary, nontraditional sources, such as the COVID Relief
Funds. The public deserves to know how much of the performance that the Treasurer
presents is not sustainable in future years. In discussions, Treasurer Lauzen has
accused the County Board of engaging in a bait and switch. Yet, the only way the
Treasurer met his required FY2026 expense reduction was by projecting increased
revenue from fines and penalties in his office. Even though, this is in the rights of the
Treasurer, it is speculative revenue. While other departments actually cut spending, the
Treasurer increased, but balanced, his budget based on "hoped for" income. Finally,
Lauzen has repeatedly claimed that residents face the largest property tax increase in
2026. However, the County Board only controls four percent of the overall tax bill. The
people of Kane County have been asking Lauzen to stop verbally attacking the Board
and its members, and to stop using time, energy, and resources in official reports for
partisan political campaign purposes. He stated that Lauzen needs to stop misleading
the public. If transparency was truly a priority, then answer the questions that are being
asked by the public.
Kane County resident, Ginger Romano, with respect to the last comment, she stated
that the majority of the County Board members do the same outwardly in Committee
meetings, such as a resolution for sanctuary status for the County. She mentioned that
Treasurer Lauzen offers a different perspective the legacy media doesn't offer.