6.
New and Unfinished Business
Approving Opioid Settlement Revenue Expenditures for Forensic Lab Expenses
and Authorizing Budget Adjustment
A.
Sheriff Hain introduced this resolution.
Coroner Silva commended the Forensic Laboratory Directors. She stated that
they are objective, knowledgeable, and have a caring attitude. She will strongly
support this resolution. She hopes the directors will continue to work with Kane
County and provide their wealth of knowledge. Silva stated that with their help,
the County will be able to achieve the goals set forth.
RESULT:
MOVER:
APPROVED BY ROLL CALL VOTE
Monica Silva
Cherryl Strathmann
SECONDER:
Michael Isaacson, Jamie Mosser, Monica Silva, and Cherryl
Strathmann
AYE:
Ron Hain
ABSTAIN:
Authorizing Funding of the Kane County Forensics Lab Renovation Project in
the Kane County Sheriff’s Office and Budget Adjustment
B.
Sheriff Hain introduced this resolution. This is for the final build out of the
Forensic Lab Testing. This area will be located at the Sheriff's Office and will
host drug testing and rapid DNA testing. He explained that the County intends to
use funding from Congressman Foster's grant for unrelated equipment. This
money will go to mitigation for opioid use. Testing will not only be used for
enforcement and investigative purposes, but the data compiled will be shared
with all area police departments, the Kane County Health Department (KCHD),
and community support task forces. This lab is the first of it's kind in Kane
County. Hain stated that the final quote for this project's construction costs is
$1,227,000.
Chairman Isaacson stated that the current balance of the Opioid Settlement
Fund is $2,586,254.82. Out of that, the Committee has allocated $667,220.34,
leaving a balance of $1,919,034,43. Isaacson noted that new money will be
received periodically as settlements are finalized.
State's Attorney Mosser stated that a modification is needed for this resolution.
SAO Chief of Civil Frank stated that the Committee will need to go through the
appropriation process and the County Board because of the use of a third party
vendor. This way the money can be appropriated to the Sheriff's Office. Then,
the Sheriff or the County Board designee will need to sign the contracts.
Mosser shared that an email was sent to the Committee regarding concerns on
the justification of the abatement. She mentioned that this expense may be