Government Center

719 S. Batavia Ave., Bldg. A

Geneva, IL 60134

Kane County

KC County Development

Committee

Meeting Minutes

FORD, Williams, Berman, Daugherty, Iqbal, Kenyon, Linder & ex-officios Davoust

(Transportation Chair), Kious (Forest Preserve President), Pierog (County Chair) and Tepe

(County Vice Chair)

Tuesday, October 17, 2023

10:00 AM

County Board Room

Call To Order

Chairman Ford called the meeting to order at 10:57 AM.

Roll Call

Board Member Ron Ford

PRESENT

Board Member Rick Williams

Board Member Dale Berman

Board Member Michael Kenyon

Board Member Michael Linder

Ex-Officio (Transportation Chairman) Mark Davoust

Ex-Officio (Forest Preserve President) Chris Kious

Ex-Officio County Board Chair Corinne M. Pierog

Ex-Officio County Board Vice Chair Vern Tepe

Board Member Gary Daugherty

REMOTE

ABSENT

Board Member Mo Iqbal

Also present: Co. Bd. members Allan*, Juby*, Lewis, Molina*, Roth, Strathmann*,

Young*; Dev. Dir. VanKerkhoff & staff Mall, Garcia, K. Miller, C. Miller; Environ. &

Water Res. Dir. Wollnik & staff Orlik; OCR Dir. Berger*; KDOT Deputy Dir. Rickert &

staff Forbes, Nika; and members of the press and public including KCFP Exec. Dir.

Ben Haberthur.

Remote Attendance Requests

Committee Chairman Ford announced the remote attendance requests for today's

meeting. He asked the Committee if there were any objections to Committee Member

Daugherty attending today's meeting remotely. There were no objections.

Approval of Minutes: September 19, 2023

RESULT:

APPROVED BY VOICE VOTE

Chris Kious

MOVER:

Rick Williams

SECONDER:

Monthly Financials

Monthly Finance Reports

Chairman Ford stated the monthly financial reports were on file. No additional

report was made.

Public Comment (Agenda Items)

Dezeri DeRaedt, Jr., 45W300 Hillview Lane, Hampshire, stated that he was proud of

Kane County for their role in farmland preservation and forest preserves. He deemed

Kane County to be one of the smartest counties in the State. However, he opposed the

proposed construction of a solar field next to Central High School and Howard B.

Thomas Grade School. He does not understand why a solar field would be placed by

the schools. Many solar fields have established signage stating "DANGER, High

Voltage". He asked the Development Committee to vote no to this proposal. If this solar

field is accepted, the school ratings could be hindered. DeRaedt, Jr., explained that

most solar fields will last approximately 10 to 15 years then become obsolete, which

will affect the land beneath them. He believes that solar panels should be located on

rooftops, on factories, and parking lots, not taking up valuable farmland. He explained

that he receives mail from solar companies to construct solar fields frequently. To this,

his answer is a simple "no". Farmland is precious and the United States is blessed to

have it. If solar is truly needed, find different locations other than behind schools.

Michelle Schutta, 45W339 Freedom Court, Hampshire, explained that she is a property

owner in the Burlington Hills Subdivision located directly across the street from the

schools, as well as a substitute teacher at Howard B. Thomas Grade School for about

15 year. She voiced her objection to the solar field being placed in the backyard of the

elementary school. Currently, the children have a limited area of playground that they

are able to play on. This solar field would hinder them more. She asked the Committee

if they would prefer their own children/grandchildren to play next to a solar field. If this

solar field is constructed, it will affect approximately 1800 individuals and three major

schools. Schutta agreed that solar is the way of the future, but should not be placed

next to schools. She explained that there has been two established solar fields in Lily

Lake and Burlington. More solar fields will equal bigger eye sores around the County.

She stated that solar fields scar the farmland.

Jeff Kerner, 6N312 Clydesdale Court, St. Charles, explained that he and his wife were

looking for homes in the Burlington area. Upon seeking real estate, this petition came

to his attention. He is opposed to his grandchildren attending a school next to a solar

field. Kerner spoke of the potential effects the solar field would have on the land. He

questioned the plans to store the excess energy. If a solar energy container is needed,

lithium-ion would be utilized, which is highly flammable. Kerner asked the Committee

what will be done to protect the residents and children from the high voltage. He listed

a number of questions that the County does not have answers to that he is aware of.

Solar fields come with a high cost. There are multiple areas within the County that a

solar field could be placed, instead of behind schools. Kerner asked the Committee to

do their due diligence when researching this matter.

Annie Halterman, 667 Thompson Avenue, North Aurora, stated she is in full support of

clean energy. She shared her concerns with the proposed solar field being located

close to the forest preserve, schools, and residents' homes. If the Committee agrees to

this solar field, it would set a precedence for other solar fields to be constructed near

schools and forest preserves. Halterman asked the Committee to find appropriate

locations for these solar facilities.

Kevin Conner, 1202 Kaneville Road, Geneva, stated he researched this petition and

read the logistics of the proposed solar field. He noted that he is a proponent of

alternative energy. However, the location and the proximity of this solar field to schools,

residents, and preserved land is not ideal. These solar fields contain high voltage, high

current, and electromagnetic interference. To have this type of power located next to a

school and resident's homes is potentially very dangerous.

Mario Ruffolo, 47W982 Route 38, Maple Park, stated he is a conservative person. That

being said, he was approached by the solar company, Horizon, to construct a solar

field on his land earlier this year. He believed this would be a good idea for the County

as it would create jobs. Ruffolo stated that many need to understand the potential risks

of climate change. We need to change are dependence on fossil fuels. Ruffolo stated

that he does not see the negative side to this petition, besides the proposed location.

This will ultimately help Kane County with renewable energy sources.

Richard Johnson, 44 Lake Marian Road, Carpentersville, stated he is in support of

community solar projects. With the growing threat of climate change and ensuing

natural catastrophes due to the excessive release of carbon emissions, many

communities around the world are looking to clean energy alternatives to replace

traditional fossil fuels. Solar energy is a sustainable renewable energy resource that

has a low environmental impact and promotes energy equity and independence.

Johnson explained that community solar projects will provide environmentally friendly

access to low cost energy to the community. He stated that the few Illinois legislative

acts pertaining to solar energy and the Kane County's 2017 Solar Statement has

demonstrated leadership in supporting renewable energy production. He commended

the Kane County Board on their support of sustainable development and renewable

energies. Johnson voiced his support on Kane County's goals of becoming more solar

friendly community. He spoke on the common oppositions of solar fields. Many solar

fields are time-bound and the land can convert to farmland after deconstruction.

Larry Stachura, 48W580 Route 38, Maple Park, stated he has been uncertain about

the process of these solar petitions. He explained that he was mailed a letter a few

weeks ago informing him of a solar farm being constructed at a neighbor's home. He

noted that the Zoning Board of Appeals approved this project. He questioned if the

solar field is safe, or if it could be turned off in case of emergency. Stachura explained

that he inherited a family farm in Maple Park. In 2000, there was a proposed rail port

that was potentially going to be built across his family farm. Just like this, he opposes

the use of the solar fields and to protect his parents wishes in keeping Kane County a

farming community.

Kane County resident, James Whittington, spoke on his opposition of solar fields. He

stated that, in Illinois, the amount of sunlight is not ideal year round for solar energy. He

explained that after speaking with residents that have solar panels on their rooftops, he

has found that they have not been paid off or efficient. Whittington explained that solar

energy is stored in lithium batteries. Lithium has to be mined for, which is destroying

the land and becomes unusable for anything further. Whittington stated that most of

the lithium mining is done in South Africa and solar panels are constructed in China

under slave labor. Due to all of this, solar fields/panels are not a good idea. Technology

has not been properly developed for solar fields and should be put on hold until the

proper technology is developed.

Greg Peloquin, Hampshire, stated he is 100% for clean energy, but it does not mean

solar fields should be placed where ever someone wants one. There is too little

short/long-term data present to know exactly how a solar farm will impact the land,

residents, and surrounding ecosystems. Peloquin stated he emailed an information

packet to the Committee addressing the four major issues to the Cardinal Creek

ecosystem. Referencing a map, he explained that the solar field will be constructed on

the Cardinal Creek ecosystem that supports the wildlife within Cardinal Creek Forest

Preserve. He noted that Cardinal Creek is a part of the Kane County's taxpayer funded

2040 Open Space Program. The goals of the 2040 Open Space Program is to continue

the efforts of protecting the environment and restoring the unique and fragile

environments associated with the geography of Kane County. Additionally, to continue

enhancing the countries visual identity and community character by preserving natural

areas, landscapes, scenic vistas, and rustic roads with their historical culture and

agricultural resources. Peloquin stated that this proposed solar field would have a direct

effect on the Open Space Program. He spoke on the negative affects on the wildlife, if

the construction of the solar field is approved. He described the affects on the schools

and community surrounding the solar field. This solar field would contain approximately

34,000 solar panels and 1.5M solar cells. Solar fields release electromagnetic radiation

(EMF). EMF has the biggest affect on children. Peloquin reviewed the National Institute

of Health CEP report. Within this report, it states, "considering the uncertain effects of

EMF exposure on children, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended

general measures, such as reducing personal EMF exposure, minimizing exposure in

schools or any location where children spend a substantial part of their day." Peloquin

stated there is no long-term studies that say there is no risk from EMF exposure. He

explained that the construction of this solar field should not be done on the highest

point of Kane County creating an eye sore.

Lynne Peloquin, Hampshire, spoke on her opposition to the solar field being

constructed near the schools, residents' homes, and wildlife. She stated she has grave

concerns of unknown impacts to children, adults, and wildlife with the proposed solar

facility. She does not believe a solar field should be constructed so close to

schools/residental areas. She understands the importance of renewable energy, but is

it also important to choose the correct location for solar fields. Peloquin strongly urged

the Committee to assess the detailed health concerns provided to the Committee, such

as the EMF exposure. The Committee needs to prioritize safety and potential health

concerns. Surrounding neighbors are compassionate about the wellbeing of the

community and County. Peloquin explained that she is not opposed to solar energy,

but rather the location of solar facilities.

Building & Zoning Division

Building & Zoning Report

Dev. Dir. VanKerkhoff provided the monthly Building and Zoning Report. The building

permit activity continues to be very busy with the recovery of storm damage, as well as,

additions and new single-family construction.

Zoning Petitions

Dev. Dir. VanKerkhoff provided a presentation on the recent amendments to the Kane

County Zoning Ordinance regarding Wind Energy Conversion Systems and

Commercial Solar Energy Facilities. He noted that these new regulations of the zoning

ordinance were adopted in May 2023. He provided a brief background of the zoning

ordinance. Kane County needed to establish energy standards due to the State Public

Act 102-1123, which requires counties to amend their zoning ordinance to include

commercial wind and solar energy provisions within 120 days. If not done, the County

would not have any siting criteria to govern potential wind or solar projects within their

jurisdiction. VanKerkhoff reviewed the process of Special Use Permit Applications,

conditions, and restrictions. VanKerkhoff listed the six factors for granting a Special

Use permit per the Kane County Zoning Ordinance.

Petition # 4615 Petitioner: Robert Matson Trust (RPIL Solar 8, LLC)

Kane County Resident, Attorney Stuart Peterson, provided a brief personal

history. He stated that there are a lot of unknowns as to what could happen in

the next 20 years with solar fields. The biggest question most solar facilities

need to answer is where should they be placed. Additionally, the

decommissioning process must be looked at in terms of deconstructing them. If

there is no money to deconstruct these solar facilities, they will just sit there and

rot. Peterson urged the Committee to look into the economic impacts and values

to the County before approving all these solar petitions. He spoke on the

potential of additional jobs that will be brought to Kane County. However, most

of these jobs will not be obtained by Kane County residents. The Committee

must think about when and where these types of developments should be

placed.

Dev. Dir. VanKerkhoff re-introduced Petition 4615: Robert Matson Trust (RPIL

Solar 8, LLC). The petition was held over from last month due to further

discussion needed. This petition is for a Special Use request in the F-Farming

District for a solar facility on the south side of Plato Road, west of Burlington

High School. VanKerkhoff shared numerous photographs and site plans of the

solar facility. He reviewed the Kane County's Water Resource Department and

Division of Transportation's stipulations. KDOT staff Nika provided a change to

KDOT's stipulation. He explained that the proposed stipulations 10 and 12 will

be replaced with "the proposed Special Use is approved contingent upon

compliance with the Plat of Survey and Site Plan attached to Petition 4615.

Deviations from the Site Plan incorporated in Petition 4615 requires approval

and compliance with Kane County Zoning Ordinance including, but not limited to

Section 25-4-8-3. Overall, Kane County staff recommends approval of this

proposed solar facility. VanKerkhoff stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals did

deny this petition with the recommended stipulations. Additionally, the Zoning

Board would like the petitioner to formalize an agreement with the Kane County

Division of Transportation (KDOT) regarding dedication along Ellithorpe Road

prior to construction of the solar facility. Lastly, VanKerkhoff stated the

surrounding area property owners have objected to this petition. VanKerkhoff

reviewed Renewable Properties, LLC's, technical memorandum update. The

memo provided additional details on the project and outreach updates since the

September Development Committee meeting.

Attorney Ben Jacobi, stated he was the attorney representing this proposed

solar facility. He introduced Lead Developer, Jeremy Price, and CohnReznick,

LLP, Property Valuation Consultant, Andrew Lines. Lines is present to explain

his review of literature and market conditions in Illinois. Jacobi introduced the

property owners of this proposed solar facility, Robert and Linda Matson. He

stated the Matson's are not absentee landowners. They are fifth generation

members of the community. Jacobi provided a brief personal background of the

Matson's.

Robert Matson provided his personal history of living in Kane County. He spoke

on his family's choice to place a solar facility on his property. His family is

ingrained in the community and would like to stay within Kane County if feasible.

In regards to wildlife, Matson stated there is not much wildlife on his property or

surrounding areas any more.

Jacobi spoke on the Zoning Board of Appeals denial of this Petition. The Zoning

Board did not deliberate and did not make any findings of fact. Jacobi explained

that the project facts and design are consistent with the State Statute and with

the County's Zoning Ordinance. Referencing a public speakers comments,

Jacobi explained that the memo included in the Petition packet addressed the

concerns many constituents have, especially the health of children. He stated

that conversations were had with the schools on the benefits they would reap,

such as gathering taxes on the solar facility. He explained that there is no risk to

the schools or the children. In fact, the State of Illinois has incentivized these

projects on and near schools. Jacobi read aloud Zoning Board of Appeals

Member Lake's comments pertaining to solar panels close to schools. He noted

that the Kane County Health Department has not provided any comments of

health concerns due to solar panels. Jacobi spoke on the possible noise that

could come from the solar facility. The transformer would be the only thing that

would make noise on a solar field. He spoke on the Health and Safety

Assessment Report: Toxicity, included in the agenda packet, by Solar Health

and Safety Expert, Tommy Cleveland. Jacobi referenced a study regarding the

affects of EMF. He explained that they are concerned about EMF exposure to

the children. However, solar panels have been found to have no affect of them.

(Davoust left at 11:58 a.m.) He spoke on the concerns of being within close

proximity of the forest preserve. As the site plan states, the forest preserve is

780 feet away from the proposed solar facility.

Lead Developer Price spoke on the drainage and installation of vegetation

growth to improve the quality in storm water retention. He explained that "High

Voltage" signs would be placed around the solar facility in accordance to the

Kane County Zoning Ordinance. He spoke on the impact to the surrounding

forest preserve. He stated that 63% of the 83 Kane County forest preserves

have included high density residential subdivisions or commercial uses. This

project is consistent with other solar facilities around forest preserves. Jacobi

and Price addressed questions and comments from the Committee. Much

discussion ensued. (Tepe left at 12:10 p.m.)

CohnReznick's Property Valuation Consultant, Andrew Lines, addressed the

concerns of property values. He explained that he has co-authored studies on

solar and it's impact on adjacent properties. Additionally, he has reviewed

academic studies that show no affect on values. He has investigated how the

market trends have been when developing solar facilities. Lines has conducted

studies on over 33 solar facilities in the Midwest. Referencing his studies, homes

are still selling for large amounts that are within close proximity of a solar field.

He provided additional information on value impacts. Committee Member

Williams read aloud Kane County Forest Preserve's Executive Director Ben

Haberthur's letter depicting his views of the multiple complaints that have been

received with respect to the forest preserve. Further discussion ensued.

County Board

RESULT:

MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE

County Board

Chris Kious

TO:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

Dale Berman

Ron Ford, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, and Chris Kious

Rick Williams, Michael Kenyon, and Michael Linder

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

AYE:

NAY:

ABSENT:

Petition # 4617 Petitioner: Dale Hartmann, et ux (ILSolar05, LLC)

Dev. Dir. VanKerkhoff presented Petition 4617: Dale Hartmann, et ux

(ILSolar05, LLC). This petition has requested a Special Use request in the

F-Farming District for a solar facility in Virgil Township. VanKerkhoff provided

numerous photographs and site plans for the proposed solar facility. He

reviewed the Kane County's Water Resources Department and Division of

Transportation stipulations. Overall, Kane County staff recommends approval of

the Special Use to allow a solar facility to be constructed on the property.

VanKerkhoff stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals approved this petition with

the recommended stipulations as well as two additional ones, such as providing

additional tree screening and a revision on the proposed fencing. He shared the

revised site plan for vegetation screening.

Farm owner Dale Hartman spoke on his desires for this project. He stated that

the other portion of his land will remain a family farm. This solar facility will help

with the daily expenses of the farm. He noted that this is a lease and will be able

to turn his land back into adequate farmland after the solar field is

decommissioned. Additionally, Hartman stated that with the proposed solar field,

new pollinators will be established.

Petitioner Andy Melka stated many discussions have been had with surrounding

neighbors and the Village of Lily Lake. Most constituents are in agreement to

construct the solar facility. While working with the Village, it has been decided

that an informational sign will be placed along the Great Western Trail. He does

understand that the neighbors do not want to see the solar field. Additional

vegetation screening will be provided to shield them from view. The screening

will be evergreen trees with indigenous plantings. Melka explained that solar

projects are safe. There are no heavy metals, lithium, or battery storage on site.

This project is isolated. Melka addressed questions and comments from the

Committee. Discussion ensued.

Neighbor Megan Miller explained she resides at the northwest property of this

proposed solar facility. After attending multiple meetings on this proposed solar

facility, she found a common theme of residents wanting more vegetation

screening. She explained that neighbors would like to see screening on the

north, east, and west sides of this solar field. She provided reasoning for

vegetation screening to farmers. This will protect the solar panels from wind and

probable damage. Screening would create biodiversity within Lily Lake, increase

the carbon storage, and decrease soil erosion. Miller would like to add 200 more

trees to the proposed 100. She spoke on the types of trees neighbors would like

to see planted. She requested the screening plan be written to hold the

developers responsible for the additional screening plans. This project could be

an example of what solar could be in Kane County. Further discussion ensued.

Committee Co-Chair Williams motioned to amend this Petition to include the

expansion of additional vegetative screening be placed around the solar facility,

Kenyon seconded. Motion carried unanimously by roll call vote.

VanKerkhoff requested a revised site plan from the petitioner to be included in

the County Board agenda packet.

County Board

RESULT:

MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE

County Board

Rick Williams

Michael Kenyon

TO:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

Ron Ford, Rick Williams, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, Michael

Kenyon, Michael Linder, and Chris Kious

AYE:

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

ABSENT:

Petition # 4618 Petitioner: John Hatch, et ux (KaneSolar3, LLC)

Dev. Dir. VanKerkhoff presented Petition 4618: John Hatch, et ux (KaneSolar3,

LLC). This petition is for a Special Use request in the F-Farming District for a

solar facility in Sugar Grove. VanKerkhoff provided numerous photographs and

site plans of the proposed solar facility. He reviewed the Kane County's Water

Resource Department and Division of Transportation stipulations. Overall, Kane

County staff recommended approval with the stipulations. The Zoning Board of

Appeals recommended approval with the stated stipulations. The Zoning Board

of Appeals added two additional stipulations addressing the tree screening and

fencing.

Petitioner Andy Melka presented the new proposal for vegetative screening. He

spoke on the landscaping that would surround this proposed solar facility. He

noted that this project has wetlands located adjacent and to the south. The

wetlands have been avoided within the site plan. He explained that extensive

tree cover around the property would add additional vegetation to provide

additional screening. Melka addressed questions and comments from the

Committee. Discussion ensued.

County Board

RESULT:

MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE

County Board

Michael Kenyon

Chris Kious

TO:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

Ron Ford, Rick Williams, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, Michael

Kenyon, Michael Linder, and Chris Kious

AYE:

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

ABSENT:

Property Code Enforcement Division

Monthly Report

Property Code Enforcement Officer Mall provided the revised monthly report. In

September, the division opened 41 new cases. They resolved 44, and 44 are

still active. One case was sent to adjudication. Mall provided a breakdown of the

locations of each violation. Currently, Aurora has the most property code

violations. Mall reviewed the types of violations, such as nuisance/property

maintenance, and building/zoning concerns. He provided graphs depicting the

length of time the cases are open. Typically, a case is opened and closed with

45 to 60 days. He reviewed the month to month comparisons from 2022 to 2023.

Mall addressed questions and comments from the Committee.

Planning & Special Projects

Monthly Report

Dev. Dir. VanKerkhoff provided the monthly Planning and Special Projects

report. No additional report was made.

Authorizing Acceptance of the DCEO Tourism Attraction Grant

Dev. Dir. VanKerkhoff presented the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)

Applications Update that addressed the following four resolutions. Currently,

there are five different ARPA projects to promote the Fabulous Fox! Water trail

and infrastructure fund. VanKerkhoff provided a brief history of these projects.

He explained each of the following resolutions. VanKerkhoff addressed

questions and comments from the Committee. Discussion ensued.

Committee Member Kious motioned to move the following four resolutions

forward, Kenyon seconded. Motion carried unanimously by roll call vote.

KC Finance and Budget Committee

RESULT:

TO:

MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE

KC Finance and Budget Committee

Chris Kious

MOVER:

Michael Kenyon

SECONDER:

Ron Ford, Rick Williams, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, Michael

Kenyon, Michael Linder, and Chris Kious

AYE:

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

ABSENT:

Authorizing a Contract with Hey and Associates, Inc., for Civil Engineering

Services for the Fabulous Fox! Water Trail in Kane County

KC Finance and Budget Committee

RESULT:

TO:

MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE

KC Finance and Budget Committee

Chris Kious

MOVER:

Michael Kenyon

SECONDER:

Ron Ford, Rick Williams, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, Michael

Kenyon, Michael Linder, and Chris Kious

AYE:

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

ABSENT:

Authorizing Acceptance of the DCEO Travel and Tourism Grant

KC Finance and Budget Committee

RESULT:

TO:

MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE

KC Finance and Budget Committee

Chris Kious

MOVER:

Michael Kenyon

SECONDER:

Ron Ford, Rick Williams, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, Michael

Kenyon, Michael Linder, and Chris Kious

AYE:

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

ABSENT:

Authorizing a Contract with Gilmore Marketing Concepts, Inc. (GMCI), for

Marketing Services for the Fabulous Fox! Water Trail and Agri-tourism in Kane

County

KC Finance and Budget Committee

RESULT:

TO:

MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE

KC Finance and Budget Committee

Chris Kious

MOVER:

Michael Kenyon

SECONDER:

Ron Ford, Rick Williams, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, Michael

Kenyon, Michael Linder, and Chris Kious

AYE:

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

ABSENT:

Process for Relocating a Business in Kane County

Committee Chair Ford stated he would like to postpone this discussion until next

month.

10.

Subdivision

Land/Cash Woodgate Estates

Environ. Mgmt staff Orlik would like the Committee to consider the request relief

explained at the previous Land/Cash Committee meeting.

RESULT:

MOVER:

APPROVED BY ROLL CALL VOTE

Rick Williams

Michael Linder

SECONDER:

Ron Ford, Rick Williams, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, Michael

Kenyon, Michael Linder, and Chris Kious

AYE:

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

ABSENT:

An Ordinance Proposing the Establishment of the Woodgate Estates

Subdivision Special Service Area (or Special Service Area No. SW-56) of Kane

County, Illinois and the Levy of Taxes for the Purpose of Paying the Cost of

Providing Special Services in and for Such Area

Environ. & Water Res. Dir. Wollnik stated that this item is a requirement under

the Storm Water Ordinance to ensure long-term maintenance of the storm water

facilities.

KC Executive Committee

RESULT:

TO:

MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE

KC Executive Committee

Dale Berman

MOVER:

Rick Williams

SECONDER:

Ron Ford, Rick Williams, Dale Berman, Gary Daugherty, Michael

Kenyon, Michael Linder, and Chris Kious

AYE:

Mo Iqbal, Mark Davoust, and Vern Tepe

ABSENT:

11.

12.

13.

Environmental Resources

None.

Water Resources

None.

Office of Community Reinvestment