details were shared on the positives of the proposal.
Brian Madigan, Director of Permitting for RLC Ventures, LLC, thanked the
County for working with them on this project.
Objector, Ed Sebin, Director of Planning and Zoning for the City of Aurora,
explained the site was contiguous to the City of Aurora, was within its planning
jurisdiction, and was part of the City's Countryside Vision Plan from 2002 which
included various government entities, including Kane County, etc. The County's
(2040) Plan identified the site as Resource Management which called for more
open space and farmland. He reminded everyone the City supports solar but the
City Council voted to oppose the special use. Further details followed, noting
that since the ZBA meeting, an annexation petition has been filed with the
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad for their property and the City of Aurora
is in the process of involuntarily annexing the land which he anticipates to be
completed by July 23rd. Notices were sent yesterday to the landowners. On
behalf of the City, he asked the board to postpone or table the petition today.
Board questions or comments centered on 1) when the involuntary annexation
petition would be completed, i.e,. July 23rd; 2) allowing the City of Aurora some
time to make a decision and 3) postponing this matter until next month.
Member Lenert moved to postpone Petition 4634 to the August 13, 20204
County Board meeting. Member Berman seconded the motion.
Continuing the dialog, Mr. Jacobi returned asked for the board to vote on the
matter today since it could vote 30 days after the public hearing. He stated the
City did not receive the notice of involuntary annexation yet (Surges leaves
10:56 AM) and provided the reasons why. Mr. Jacobi discussed the length of
time involved and the issues that would be raised by the City of Aurora. He
asked for this board's consideration. Mr. Madigan returned and explained the
length of time that he has been involved with this project (year and one-half)
and, again, reminded the board there was no development interest in the land.
This proposal was the highest and best use for the landowner. Roll call to
postpone Petition No. 4634:
Aye: Berman, Ford, Gumz, Iqbal, Lenert, Roth, Williams, Young
Nay: Allan, Bates, Daugherty*, Davoust, Juby, Kenyon, Kious, Lewis,
Linder*, Molina, Sanchez, Silva, Strathmann, Tepe
Away: Surges
Absent: Tarver
MOTION TO POSTPONE FAILED. VOTE: 8-14
Additional board questions/comments followed as to 1) the type, manufacturer,
and model of the solar panels being installed; the fact that the land was a good
site for such use; and that the site had poor soil quality anyway.
Roll call on the original motion to approve Petition No. 4634 followed: