unnerving and stressful. She is consistently on guard and watchful. She was
encouraged to hear that the County was addressing STR properties. Her expectation
was that the County was going to create a meaningful ordinance to elevate the
concerns of the residential homeowners. However, after reading the proposal, she was
disheartened. She stated that the proposed ordinance provides a broad and
unenforceable accommodation for STR property owners to continue their operation.
Davisson stated the most disturbing is that a full 180-day stay was deemed reasonable,
which disturbs the neighbor's way of life for six months of the year. As the primary
stakeholders, she requested that the Committee reconsider the 180-day stipulation and
lower it to the absolute minimum threshold allowed by law. She explained that the
neighbors in this area take care of one another and the community, but this is not the
case with absentee property owners, whose investment is only in their bottom line. She
thanked the Committee for studying this matter and their time.
Susan Blassick, St. Charles, stated that STR's are nothing new and have been a
popular option for family getaways. She explained that the majority of these rentals
exist in resort towns or coastal vacation towns, where they fit in with the local
community. With the AirBnB and VRBO platforms, STR homes were no longer located
in popular vacation spots, but in private neighborhoods. Blassick explained that buying
a home and renting it out to people became attractive to those trying to make a profit.
Therefore, these rentals infiltrated into residential communities. She stated that the
owners of these properties are investors, not a part of the community. Therefore, they
have no vested interest in becoming part of the neighborhood, in which the property is
located. She noted that numerous communities around the country have banned
STR's. She would prefer that Kane County ban STR's in neighborhoods zoned
residential, due to the fact that they do not add any value to the community and detract
from the neighborhood. However, if there are legal hurdles to enforce a ban on STR's,
she strongly suggested that the Committee change the proposed ordinance to mandate
that all STR property owners be required to live in the property for a minimum of nine
months a year, which will allow them to rent the home for the remaining three months.
Alternatively, while the STR owners reside in the home for 12 months, they would be
able to rent one or two rooms of their home the entire year. Blassick stated that this
requirement would make the STR owner a more invested neighbor and minimize the
housing shortage. Additionally, this would allow the STR owner to make an income
stream for themselves without creating a nuisance for the neighborhood. Blassick
questioned how STR businesses can be legally opened up in a zoned residential area.
She stated that the neighbors of a STR have put much thought into this ordinance
proposal, and even though there may be legal limitations, they would like to hear about
why these actions cannot be taken. She thanked the Committee for their consideration
on this issue and hopes for a carefully thought out ordinance.
William Ronget, St. Charles, stated that he lives on a dead end street in unincorporated
Kane County with eight other homes. He explained that when the STR located on his
road, they hosted high-capacity events. The street can be filled with many varieties of
vehicles. He questioned how first responders would be able to address an emergency
situation. He explained that there are three homes where elderly neighbors reside at
the end of the cul-de-sac. He questioned how they would be reached in an emergency
situation, if first responders could not respond adequately. Additionally, when party
buses and limos are parked on the road and block first responders from addressing an