7.
Finance Report
Monthly Finance Reports
A.
Chairman Kious stated the monthly financial report was on file. No additional
report was made.
FY2025 BLD/ITD Budget Reports
B.
No report was made.
8.
Facilities Master Plan Update (Jason Dwyer, Wight & Co.)
BLD staff Files provided the Facilities Master Plan update. She explained that 7-10
days before a future scheduled County Board meeting, a final draft of the Facilities
Master Plan will be sent to all County Board Members for a last review, before an
official vote to adopt the plan is taken. She reviewed the Executive Summary of the
Master Plan Projects for the short, mid, and long-term recommendations and the
changes that were made due to suggestions from County Board Members. Files
reviewed the Judicial Campus Site Plan depicting the County's existing buildings,
proposed buildings, and future development sites. She highlighted the parcel
restrictions to depict the areas that are restricted under Public Act 86-729, which allows
the property to be utilized for only criminal courts or drug treatment uses. Files shared
the County's Government Center Site Campus Site Concepts. She noted that the
County Board has options on how to move forward with expanding the Government
Campus and they are not recommending one option over another. Files requested the
Committee share any additional concerns or changes to be made to the Master Plan. If
not, she would recommend finalizing the Facilities Master Plan to be sent out in
advance to County Board Members for review. Once the plan is thoroughly gone
through, the plan will be presented to the County Board for adoption. Chairman Kious
requested that this version of the Master Plan be sent to all Board Members for review
before the final draft is presented to the County Board.
9.
Executive Director's Report (R. Fahnestock)
ITD/BLD Exec. Dir. Fahnestock stated that the Facilities Master Plan focuses more on
site development or site potential (Davoust arrived in person at 10:40 am). Additional
conversations will be had in the future, if it would make more sense to develop and
work through some of the site development infrastructure, as opposed to the buildings
itself. Fahnestock explained that when the Kane County Multi-Use Building was built, it
was positioned in a way that blocks the access road to the eastern property at the
Judicial Center Campus. He noted that in this example, infrastructure should have
been the precedence, which is prevalent in this Master Plan.
Regarding the monthly Executive Director's Report, Fahnestock stated that Building
Management staff has been working with realtor brokers, JLL Chicago, Chittenden,
Murday & Novotny, LLC (CMN), and the Kane County State's Attorney's Office on
purchasing potential real estate. Additionally, Fahnestock has been revisiting the Kane
County's 2006 Strategic Plan. He noted that copies of the plan have been distributed to
the County Board via e-mail. He explained that there was a resolution on the previous
County Board meeting agenda that approved the submission of a Request for
Proposals (RFP) for the development of a new strategic plan that was put forth by the
Finance Department and not the Building Management Department (BLD). He stated