a letter that would be signed, if approved, to show the Kane County Board's support on
extending the TIF for an additional 12 years. She stated that this letter of support is a
political endorsement. She explained what a TIF is and why it matters. She stated that
TIFs were created to help struggling neighborhoods. However, today, TIFs are often
used to redirect public tax dollars away from schools, counties, libraries, and pensions.
Instead, these tax dollars are being funneled into city controlled development accounts.
Mehr stated that this one TIF, if extended, would cost Kane County Government
$4.6M, and the Kane County Forest Preserve and Pension Funds $1.9M. This is a total
of $6.5M that would be diverted away from essential public services, just to support
projects chosen by the City of Elgin. She explained that the County Board cannot
approve or deny the TIF, but they are being asked to bless the extension. If the County
Board approves this, they are saying to residents that they support this continued
diversion of tax revenue away from the County's budget and people. Mehr urged the
County Board not to sign this resolution. She explained that the County Board is
responsible for Kane County's financial health, not Elgin's development. In a time of
budget shortfalls, deteriorating infrastructure, and unfunded pensions, the County must
not support policies that make this worse. Mehr asked the Board to send the message
to Elgin and Illinois that this Board will not endorse more taxpayer give-a-ways. She
was puzzled as to why Madam Chairman Pierog would put forth such a declaration of
support to extend the TIF for 12 more years, especially when it drains Kane County's
budget. However, she explained that all the County building projects that Pierog has
proposed, such as the new Public Health building, were not approved. Mehr explained
that even though these building projects were not approved, Pierog is still beholdened
to the construction firms and other businesses that have supported her campaigns.
Frank Esposito, St. Charles, spoke on the FY2026 Budget. He mentioned that he had
trouble downloading today's 900+ page agenda packet. (Madam Chairman Pierog
arrived in-person at 9:07 a.m.) He referenced Resolution 9I: Approving a Balanced
Budget for Kane County FY2026 General Fund - General Account. He incorrectly
assumed that this resolution was the approval of the FY2026 Budget. However, he was
advised that this resolution was to state that the County Board was going to present a
balanced budget for FY2026. Esposito stated that he was at the last Special Finance
Committee meeting. He understood that notifications were going to be sent out to
department heads asking them for a projection of their budget with a 10% reduction
versus the expenses of FY2024. He noted that this is a great way to start the budget
process. He is interested in seeing the departments' reports of what they are able to
do. He wished there was a way for the general public to be able to see this kind of
information before it comes before the Committee. This would allow the public to better
understand where or if managers cut back. Esposito stated that he will continue to
attend these meetings to find out what will occur. He wanted to ensure that everyone
understands that budget cuts have to be made.
Brian Anderson, Sugar Grove, explained that at the May 20, 2025 Special Finance
Committee meeting, he recommended that all Kane County Board committees receive
a monthly dashboard report. He spoke on when his son-in-law asked him for his
approval to marry his daughter. His son-in-law provided Anderson with a PowerPoint
presentation that broke down the wedding budget. Anderson presented his son-in-law
with his personal budget for the wedding and noted that everything outside of the
allotted budget would be up to them. He stated that this reminds him of the Kane