Judiciary partners.
Kane County resident, Ginger Romano, stated the County continues to spend as if they
are still receiving American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding. However, the County
Board is now wanting to dig further into residents' pockets and impose increases and
new taxes. Romano requested the County take a look at PACE and the bus system.
Each time she passes a bus, she stated it is empty, which is a waste of energy, gas,
and maintenance. She suggested the County provide Uber vouchers to residents that
need public transportation. Additionally, she recommended that a tax be imposed on all
electrical bikes and electric vehicles that use the County roadways. Romano spoke on
the Grocery Tax. When conducting her own research, she found that the money raised
by the tax goes to the State into several funds, one being a Trust Fund. She
questioned where the money is actually going. Lastly, she explained that 75% of the
County residents who voted on the tax referendum, said no. She questioned why the
County Board is not listening to their constituents.
Brian Anderson, Sugar Grove, spoke on agenda items 6B: Authorizing an Increase in
the County Motor Fuel Tax and 6C: Establishing and Imposing a County Grocery
Retailers' Occupation Tax and a County Grocery Service Occupation Tax for the
County of Kane. In doing his own research of the surrounding collar counties, he has
come to understand the reasoning for the increase and the strategy. As a concerned
tax payer, Anderson stated that he has not seen the vital budget cuts that have been
proposed. He questioned why the County Board has not made the tough financial cuts.
He explained that the County has approximately 500 non-union employees. He
questioned why a hiring freeze and/or a vacancy freeze has not been implemented, or
why the non-critical capital projects have not been suspended or deferred. While
looking into the County's real estate, he stated there are 39 buildings, of which six to
eight of them could be sold. As a curious tax payer, Anderson understands the hard
decisions that the County Board needs to make. However, he stated it would feel better
if the budget cuts were being made. He spoke on the financial cliff the County will face
in FY2027, due to the County not making the necessary budget cuts. Lastly, he
recommended that the Judiciary and Public Safety partners be spoken to about the
non-essential cuts that could be made.
Michelle Bettag, St. Charles, explained she has continually watched over the last three
years, and the out-of-hand spending of proposals of new large projects with Covid
Relief and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding. She stated that large amounts
of revenue has been received by the County through interest earned and/or assessed
values on real estate. She explained that the Director of the Board has seen the
increase in expenditures, but has continually placed large projects on agendas for
additional spending. As residents, we have asked the County to stop the spending and
expending reserves, yet the County continues to hurt those that need the help the
most. Bettag recommended the County rescind the Responsible Bidders' Ordinance
(RBO). She cannot understand why the County has this ordinance in place. She
explained that the RBO is costing the County additional money. She questioned if the
County Board did not see the fiscal cliff. She urged the Board to look at the County's
expenses and make the necessary budget cuts. Bettag stated that County residents
are paying attention to those County Board members who are voting for tax increases
and new taxes.