revenue was spent appropriately. Rickert noted that the RTA Sales Tax is
KDOT's primary source of revenue, which funds maintenance projects. The RTA
Sales Tax revenue equates to 33% of KDOT's overall budget. Rickert provided
the historical context on how Public Safety became apart of this legislation. He
reviewed the historical actions of the Kane County Board to assist the County's
General Fund with Transportation funding. Rickert stated that this is a policy
issue and he will follow what the County Board sets forth. He spoke on the
significant impacts of the $4M transfer would have on the Transportation
Improvement Program (five-year financial plan). He added that KDOT will
continue to seek federal and state grants to help with the financial shortfalls.
However, sought out grants will be focused more on maintenance activities.
Rickert reviewed the list of projects and programs that will be impacted if the
sales tax reduction were to occur. Rickert presented KDOT's Proposed FY2025
Budget Revenues and Expenditures - Recurring and New Capital Project Costs.
KDOT's proposed FY2025 budget is approximately 8% less than FY2024.
Rickert stated that today's presentation was an overview to show the County
Board what would need to occur if the $4M or 60% reduction is implemented.
From the staff level, the primary goal will be to try to protect the existing grants.
Currently, there is inadequate matching funds for FY2025 through FY2028, with
an estimated shortfall of $33M. KDOT will need to limit further grant applications
and submit only bridge maintenance grants. The Randall at Hopps Intersection
and CNRR Grade Separation projects are KDOT's greatest concern. Rickert
stated that the proposed RTA Sales Tax decrease of 60% will have a severe
and immediate impact on capital projects as the County already has limited
funds for matching grants. Rickert addressed questions and comments from the
Committee. Discussion ensued.
Adopting Requests for County Offices and Departments for Proposed
Reductions in the Preparation of the FY2025 County Budget
C.
Court Srvs. Exec. Dir. Aust reiterated that when budget cuts are talked about,
especially something as complex as the court system, they cannot be discussed
in isolation. Each judiciary and public safety department cannot simply provide
cuts without conferring with the other partners to make sure these cuts do not
have adverse effects on one another. Additionally, Aust stated that the County
Board should look at the how they would like the County and court system to be
ran. Everyone in the County needs to have a say in this. The Finance
Department gave a two-day time frame to come up with adequate cuts. This not
conducive to strategic planning. These proposed budget cuts need to have time
for preparation in order to transition appropriately.
Committee Vice-Chair Lenert stated that the Finance Committee understands
the hardships these potential cuts could have. He was pleased to hear that four
County departments/offices were able to cut approximately $544K from the
General Fund's budget. He stated that the County Board will need to focus on
addressing the $4.5M shortfall.
Committee Member Tepe spoke on Aust's presentation at the Judicial Public
Safety (JPS) Committee on the impacts these budget cuts would have on Court
Services. He stated that the majority of the departments/offices have done a
good job staying within the budget guidelines set forth by the County Board. One
of the main points Aust made was that any implemented budget cuts would be