Government Center  
719 S. Batavia Ave., Bldg. A  
Geneva, IL 60134  
Kane County  
KC Finance and Budget Committee  
Meeting Minutes  
BERMAN, Lenert, Juby, Lewis, Sanchez, Surges, Tepe & ex-officios Pierog (County Chair)  
Monday, August 19, 2024  
9:00 AM  
County Board Room  
***SPECIAL MEETING***  
1.  
2.  
Call To Order  
Chairman Berman called the meeting to order at 9:00 AM.  
Roll Call  
Board Member Dale Berman  
Board Member Bill Lenert  
Board Member Leslie Juby  
Board Member Vern Tepe  
PRESENT  
Board Member Anita Lewis  
Board Member Jarett Sanchez  
Board Member Clifford Surges  
REMOTE  
ABSENT  
Ex-Officio County Board Chair Corinne M. Pierog  
Also present: Co. Bd. Members Allan*, Bates, Gumz*, Kenyon, Kious*, Molina*, Roth,  
Strathmann*; Fin. Exec. Dir. Hopkinson; KDOT Deputy Dir. Rickert; ITD/BLD Exec. Dir.  
Fahnestock & staff Lasky*, Files, Peters; Sheriff Hain; Auditor Wegman; State's  
Attorney Mosser* & staff Frank, Hunt*, Shepro; Circuit Clk. Barreiro & staff Herwick,  
Johnson; Public Defender Conant; Court Srvs. Exec. Dir. Aust & staff Davis; Court  
Admin. O'Brien & staff Mathis; Asst. Region. Supt. Oliver; HRM Exec. Dir. Lobrillo;  
KCAC Admin. Youngsteadt*; KCHD CFO Snowden*; and members of the press and  
public.  
(Committee Member Sanchez arrived remotely 9:01 a.m.)  
3.  
Remote Attendance Requests  
Chairman Berman announced the remote attendance requests for today's meeting. He  
asked the Committee if there were any objections to Committee Members Lewis and  
Sanchez attending today's meeting remotely. There were no objections.  
4.  
5.  
Approval of Minutes: None  
Public Comment (Agenda Items)  
None.  
6.  
Public Comment (Non-Agenda Items)  
None.  
7.  
New Business  
Fiscal Year 2025 Budget - Presentation  
A.  
Fin. Exec. Dir. Hopkinson provided the FY2025 Budget presentation. She noted  
that this presentation included the responses to the Finance Committee's  
requests from the previous meeting. Hopkinson reviewed the 2025 Budget  
Reduction Requests - General Fund. She noted that she heard back from the  
majority of the County's departments/offices on possible budget cuts for the  
FY2025 budget. Only four departments were able to make cuts totaling $544K.  
Other departments stated they could not afford to make any budget cuts.  
Hopkinson provided the details of the $544K budget cuts. (Committee Member  
Lewis arrived remotely at 9:02 a.m.) She reviewed the details of the elimination  
of the $4.3M transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund. The  
Building Management Department provided a list of building improvement  
projects that will be impacted by this elimination. Hopkinson provided detailed  
information on the General Government Revenues that Kane County receives  
and in which County fund they are allocated to. She reviewed the State of Illinois  
Department of Revenue's estimate reporting regarding the projections, if the  
Kane County voters implemented a Special County Retailers' Occupation Tax.  
She provided four financial examples of the County collecting this tax at a  
0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75% and 1%. Hopkinson presented the current Assessor  
Estimated Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) Report by Tax District - Kane  
County. Provided the estimated EAV, Hopkinson shared the Property Tax  
options that included Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) of 0.00% or 3.4%. If  
property tax was collected with a CPI value of 3.4% the annual change is County  
revenue would be $2,655,570.15. At a CPI of 0.00%, the County would bring in  
$657,235,93. Hopkinson recommended that if the County did raise property  
taxes to the 3.4%, to apply $657K to the Veterans' Commission Fund and the  
FICA Social Security Fund. She noted that the overall General Fund would not  
benefit from this increase. Hopkinson provided the FICA Fund (Payroll Taxes) -  
Forecast and Reserve Target. She noted that both the FICA Fund and IMRF  
Fund are currently using reserves. She provided detail information on these two  
funds. Hopkinson addressed questions and comments from the Committee.  
Much discussion ensued.  
County Board Member Bates requested that emails being sent to the Finance  
Committee be sent to all County Board Members. Further discussion ensued.  
Overview of Regional Transportation Sales Tax  
B.  
KDOT Deputy Dir. Rickert provided an overview of the Regional Transportation  
Sales Tax as authorized by the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) Act. His  
primary point of discussion for today is the impact of the potential $4M one-year  
transfer of the RTA Sales Tax. He provided a brief history of the RTA Sales Tax.  
This tax was implemented to address funding shortfalls and local transportation  
needs within the Chicago region. Kane County Division of Transportation  
(KDOT) and other surrounding county transportation departments worked with  
RTA, the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), and legislators to  
create the funding to address highway safety, capacity, maintenance, and transit  
needs. The Kane County Board adopted policies to ensure that this sales tax  
revenue was spent appropriately. Rickert noted that the RTA Sales Tax is  
KDOT's primary source of revenue, which funds maintenance projects. The RTA  
Sales Tax revenue equates to 33% of KDOT's overall budget. Rickert provided  
the historical context on how Public Safety became apart of this legislation. He  
reviewed the historical actions of the Kane County Board to assist the County's  
General Fund with Transportation funding. Rickert stated that this is a policy  
issue and he will follow what the County Board sets forth. He spoke on the  
significant impacts of the $4M transfer would have on the Transportation  
Improvement Program (five-year financial plan). He added that KDOT will  
continue to seek federal and state grants to help with the financial shortfalls.  
However, sought out grants will be focused more on maintenance activities.  
Rickert reviewed the list of projects and programs that will be impacted if the  
sales tax reduction were to occur. Rickert presented KDOT's Proposed FY2025  
Budget Revenues and Expenditures - Recurring and New Capital Project Costs.  
KDOT's proposed FY2025 budget is approximately 8% less than FY2024.  
Rickert stated that today's presentation was an overview to show the County  
Board what would need to occur if the $4M or 60% reduction is implemented.  
From the staff level, the primary goal will be to try to protect the existing grants.  
Currently, there is inadequate matching funds for FY2025 through FY2028, with  
an estimated shortfall of $33M. KDOT will need to limit further grant applications  
and submit only bridge maintenance grants. The Randall at Hopps Intersection  
and CNRR Grade Separation projects are KDOT's greatest concern. Rickert  
stated that the proposed RTA Sales Tax decrease of 60% will have a severe  
and immediate impact on capital projects as the County already has limited  
funds for matching grants. Rickert addressed questions and comments from the  
Committee. Discussion ensued.  
Adopting Requests for County Offices and Departments for Proposed  
Reductions in the Preparation of the FY2025 County Budget  
C.  
Court Srvs. Exec. Dir. Aust reiterated that when budget cuts are talked about,  
especially something as complex as the court system, they cannot be discussed  
in isolation. Each judiciary and public safety department cannot simply provide  
cuts without conferring with the other partners to make sure these cuts do not  
have adverse effects on one another. Additionally, Aust stated that the County  
Board should look at the how they would like the County and court system to be  
ran. Everyone in the County needs to have a say in this. The Finance  
Department gave a two-day time frame to come up with adequate cuts. This not  
conducive to strategic planning. These proposed budget cuts need to have time  
for preparation in order to transition appropriately.  
Committee Vice-Chair Lenert stated that the Finance Committee understands  
the hardships these potential cuts could have. He was pleased to hear that four  
County departments/offices were able to cut approximately $544K from the  
General Fund's budget. He stated that the County Board will need to focus on  
addressing the $4.5M shortfall.  
Committee Member Tepe spoke on Aust's presentation at the Judicial Public  
Safety (JPS) Committee on the impacts these budget cuts would have on Court  
Services. He stated that the majority of the departments/offices have done a  
good job staying within the budget guidelines set forth by the County Board. One  
of the main points Aust made was that any implemented budget cuts would be  
to personnel, who do an effective job for this County. Tepe stated that the  
County needs to look at how to handle this shortfall and not look at budget cuts  
of people.  
Committee Member Juby spoke on her surprise of trying to implement FY2025  
budget cuts, when the plan of the Board was to utilize excess reserve funds to  
balance the FY2024 and FY2025 budget. She suggested that the Finance  
Committee honor the decisions of the County Board to spend down the County's  
excess reserves until FY2026 and find two additional revenue sources, such as  
the Special County Retailers' Occupation Tax. Discussion ensued.  
Fin. Exec. Dir. Hopkinson reminded the Committee that when the FY2025  
budget process began, it was discussed that all departments/offices cut back on  
their expenses in order to avoid budget cuts. The Board set parameters and  
provisions for departments/offices to stick to, such as reducing vacancy  
positions. Hopkinson shared her concerns on the Request for Proposal (RFP)  
for strategic plan services. If the County decides to move forward, any  
reductions in services will need to go through strategically. Much discussion  
ensued.  
Hopkinson stated that within this resolution there are a few items would have to  
change to reflect the Finance Committee direction. In the fourth WHEREAS  
clause, the amount of $15M would be changed to $19,445,661. In the seventh  
WHEREAS clause, the $5M would need to be changed to $554,339.  
Tepe motioned to amend this resolution to reflect the suggestions of Hopkinson  
as previously stated, Lenert seconded. Motion passed by a 4-2 vote.  
KC Finance and Budget Committee  
RESULT:  
MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE  
KC Finance and Budget Committee  
Bill Lenert  
TO:  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
Vern Tepe  
Dale Berman, Bill Lenert, Anita Lewis, and Vern Tepe  
Leslie Juby, and Jarett Sanchez  
AYE:  
NAY:  
Clifford Surges, and Corinne M. Pierog  
ABSENT:  
Authorizing the Submission to the Electors of the County of Kane by  
Referendum on the April 1, 2025, Consolidated Election Ballot the Question of  
Imposing a 0.75% Special County Retailers’ Occupation Tax for Public Safety  
Purposes  
D.  
Committee Vice-Chair Lenert motioned to amend this resolution. He stated that  
in the fifth WHEREAS clause, the "for the next regularly scheduled election,  
which is April 1, 2025, general election, for a 1% Special County Retailers'  
Occupation Tax for public safety purposes," wording needs to be changed to "for  
the next regularly scheduled consolidated election, which is April 1, 2025  
election, for a 1% Special County Retailers' Occupation Tax for public safety  
purposes,"General Election wording needs to be amended to Consolidated  
Election ballot, Sanchez seconded. Discussion ensued. Motion carried  
unanimously by roll call vote.  
Committee Member Juby reviewed the projected revenue the County would  
receive from implementing this sales tax. She voiced her concerns on accepting  
a 1% sales tax. She questioned if the County were to adopt a 0.5% sales tax,  
what the options would be to ask the public for more at a future date. She  
suggested amending this resolution from 1% to 0.5%. Discussion ensued on the  
County's options for increasing revenue and the proposed percentage amount.  
Juby motioned to change the 1% Special County Retailers' Occupation Tax to  
0.5%, Lenert seconded. Discussion ensued. Motion was rescinded.  
Lenert motioned to change the amount from 1% to 0.75%, Juby seconded.  
Discussion ensued. Motion passed by a 4-2 vote.  
KC Executive Committee  
RESULT:  
TO:  
MOVED FORWARD BY ROLL CALL VOTE  
KC Executive Committee  
Vern Tepe  
MOVER:  
Bill Lenert  
SECONDER:  
Dale Berman, Bill Lenert, Leslie Juby, Anita Lewis, and Jarett  
Sanchez  
AYE:  
Vern Tepe  
NAY:  
Clifford Surges, and Corinne M. Pierog  
ABSENT:  
8.  
Old Business  
None.  
9.  
Committee Chairman's Comments  
Chairman Berman stated that he was pleased to see that the Finance Committee has  
arrived to these decisions and commended the effort put forth.  
10.  
11.  
Executive Session (if needed)  
None.  
Adjournment  
RESULT:  
APPROVED BY VOICE VOTE  
Bill Lenert  
Vern Tepe  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
This meeting was adjourned at 11:07 AM.  
Savannah Valdez  
Sr. Recording Secretary