changing definition of public safety that has been shared at the town meetings. She
concluded that public safety includes, but is not limited to, crime prevention, detention,
fire fighting, police, medical, ambulance, et cetera. She addressed the "not limited to"
clause. At the Elgin Town Hall Meeting, it was mentioned that the retail sales tax would
help with installing lactation rooms and repairing leaking pipes. Bettag stated that the
proposed 0.75% retail sales tax would generate an additional $51M, which is a 47%
increase in the County's General Fund. She noted that the public safety scare tactic is
mind numbing and she is tired of seeing Madam Chairman Pierog, Board Members,
and specific departments not being told "no". Bettag stated that the County should
have a spending freeze. She explained that when the public is being told that this
proposed sales tax revenue would be placed into a special fund, it is not true.
According to the Illinois Department of Revenue, David Harris, the County Board can
decide on where this additional revenue could be placed. Bettag stated that this will
become a slush fund for projects. If the County was in the financial bind that has been
stated, none of the projects listed would be considered.
Brian Anderson, Sugar Grove, mentioned that he came today to listen to the Finance
Committee meeting. However, he chose to address the Committee after he saw
County Board Member, Mavis Bates, District 4, attending. He recalled the ninth Kane
County Retail Sales Tax Awareness meeting article published in Kane County
Connects. He spoke on his embarrassment that the Sugar Grove Town Hall Meeting
was cancelled. He explained that the meeting was cancelled not due to a Board
Member, who should have known the proper protocol, but because a Kane County
citizen noticed that the location of the scheduled meeting was at a polling place, in
which electioneering is not allowed. Anderson stated that he met with the Sugar Grove
citizen and thanked him. He noted that the Kane County Board Member that was
hosting this event should have known this and held the meeting, elsewhere. He stated
that if the Board cannot handle the small details, they certainly cannot handle the big
ones.
6.
Treasurer's Report (C. Lauzen)
Monthly Report
A.
Treasurer Lauzen stated the monthly report was on file. He explained that a
point being made at the Town Hall awareness meetings needs correction. That
the public has been told that the tax freeze has caused the need for the
referendum and that the County left money on the table during this freeze. He
noted that this is not an accurate assessment. He mentioned that today's
presentation will show a historical record on how much tax relief was provided in
the past. He explained that all money that is earned/saved belongs to the
government and it is up to them on how much each entity gets to keep. Lauzen
stated that the total tax relief that was provided to the County during 2020 was
$119M, which included the Kane County Forest Preserve. He mentioned that
the County was in such solid condition, that there were surpluses each year,
more revenue than expense, and the County was able to pay down the public
debt by 70%. Lauzen referenced the January 29, 2025 Finance Committee
meeting's financial reports. In this report it showed that between 2014 to 2022,
the County had more revenue than expenses. However in 2024, the County's
expenses were more than revenue. Finally, Lauzen addressed the notion that
there was no increase to taxes and/or revenue that the County receives, which